LO2: Conduct and analyse research relevant to a chosen business research project.

  • P3 Conduct primary and secondary research using appropriate methods for a business research project that consider costs, access and ethical issues.
  • P4 Apply appropriate analytical tools to analyse research findings and data.

2.1: Research as a process:
  • Research has distinct phases which support a coherent and logical argument. This includes using literature review - secondary research to inform a primary, empirical, study.
  • Individual appointments to discuss draft literature review
  • Conducting research
2.2: Selecting a sample:
  • The importance of gathering data and information (qualitative or quantitative) to support research analysis.
  • Selecting sample types and sizes that are relevant to the research.
  • Considering sampling approaches and techniques including probability and non-probability sampling.
2.3: Ethics, reliability and validity:
  • Research should be conducted ethically. How is this achieved and reported?
  • Research should also be reliable (similar results would be achieved from a similar sample) and valid (the research measures what it aimed to measure).
2.4: Analysing data:
  • Using data collection tools such as interviews and questionnaires.
  • Using analytical techniques such as trend analysis, coding or typologies.
2.5: Primary research / field work - independent research:
  • Experiment, Survey, Case study, Action research,
  • Grounded theory, Ethnography and Archival research

LO3: Communicate the outcomes of a research project to identied stakeholder

P5: Communicate research outcomes in an appropriate manner for the intended audience.

3.1: Stakeholders:
  • Who are they? 
  • Why would they be interested in the research outcomes?
  • What communication method do they expect?
3.2: Communicating research outcomes:
  • Consideration of different methods of communicating outcomes (e.g. written word, spoken word) and the medium (e.g. report, online, presentation).
  • The method and medium will be influenced by the research and its intended audience.
3.3: Convincing arguments:
  • No matter what the method/medium, all research should be convincing and presented logically where the assumption is that the audience has little or no knowledge of the research process.
  • The importance of developing evaluative conclusions

LO 4: Reflect on the application of research methodologies


P6: Reflect on the effectiveness of research methods applied for meeting objectives of the business research project.

P7: Consider alternative research methodologies and lessons learnt in view of the outcomes.

4.1: Reflection for learning and practice:
  • Difference between reflecting on performance and evaluating a research project.
  • The former considers the research process; the latter considers the quality of the research argument and use of evidence.
  • Reflection on the merits, limitations and potential pitfalls of the chosen methods.
4.2: The cycle of reflection:
  • To include reflection in action and reflection on action.
  • Considering how to use reflection to inform future behaviour and future considerations.
4.3: Reflective writing:
  • Avoiding generalisation and focusing on personal development and the research journey in a critical and objective way.